nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
建筑类实验室“数智+精细”管理模式研究
基金项目(Foundation):
邮箱(Email):
DOI:
发布时间: 2026-08-05
出版时间: 2026-08-05
网络发布时间: 2026-08-05
移动端阅读
摘要:

针对建筑类实验室空间、设备与安全管理的复杂性,以及传统模式适配性不足的问题,该文立足建筑类学科实验场景特征,分析同类实验室管理现状与差异化短板。结合某高校建筑学院实证迭代实践,构建了“数智+精细”融合管理模式,形成三位一体的协同体系:以建筑信息模型(BIM)、物联网、人工智能(AI)等技术支撑空间动态调度、安全实时预警与设备全生命周期追溯;以空间弹性划分、分层安全责任管控等制度保障技术落地;适配建筑学科多元场景特性。实践表明,该模式可提升空间利用率、降低安全风险、优化资源配置,为同类实验室管理升级提供参考。

Abstract:

[Objective] Architectural laboratories play a central role in practical teaching and scientific research in architecture, urban planning, and related disciplines. However, their management suffers from challenges related to complex spatial utilization patterns, diversity of used professional equipment, and discipline-specific safety risks. Traditional management modes are characterized by fixed partitioning, manual registration, and regular maintenance, which lead to low space utilization, a high idle rate of large-scale instruments, lagging early safety warnings, and poor adaptation to interdisciplinary experimental needs. To solve these problems, this study developed an integrated “digital intelligence + refinement” management mode for architectural laboratories. It aimed to break through efficiency bottlenecks with digital technologies and resolve landing pain points with refined systems to achieve the collaborative optimization of space utilization, equipment utilization, and safety management and provide a replicable reference for the management upgrading of similar laboratories in universities. [Methods] This research adopted a combined approach of case comparison and empirical iteration. First, through case comparison, management practices of architectural laboratories in comprehensive universities, engineering universities, and professional art academies were analyzed to identify common problems and disciplinary characteristics. Second, by taking the School of Architecture at Soochow University as the empirical object, a phased iterative practice was adopted. In the first stage, a building information modeling (BIM)-based three-dimensional (3D) modeling platform was built to link equipment parameters, operational procedures, and spatial demand rules. In the second stage, an intelligent closed-loop safety system, including intelligent cabinets for hazardous chemicals, artificial intelligence (AI) visual monitoring, and access control linkage, was deployed to realize whole-process traceability and real-time risk identification. In the third stage, refined supporting mechanisms were established, such as flexible spatial division, hierarchical safety responsibility, equipment full-life-cycle management, and professional team training. Mode effectiveness was dynamically evaluated and optimized using indicators such as the space utilization rate, safety incident rate, and equipment sharing rate. [Results] The empirical results showed that the proposed “digital intelligence + refinement” mode achieved significant application outcomes. BIM and Internet of Things technologies enabled dynamic spatial scheduling and real-time environmental monitoring. The waiting time for equipment in the model laboratory was reduced from more than 2 hours to 25 minutes, and the space could be quickly reorganized within 15 minutes to allow multi-scenario experimentation. In terms of safety management, the intelligent monitoring system accurately identified high-frequency, risky behaviors in architectural experiments with a recognition accuracy of 98% and realized graded early warning and closed-loop disposal. The standardized management of hazardous chemicals with low toxicity and high volatility eliminated illegal storage and misuse. For equipment management, a digital ledger documenting purchased and self-developed instruments was established to enable full-life-cycle tracing and priority-based maintenance, greatly reducing the failure rate of self-developed devices and improving the overall utilization rate of instruments. Meanwhile, the refined training and assessment system enhanced the comprehensive competence of technical staff in BIM operation, equipment calibration, and safety control, ensuring the sustainable implementation of digital systems. [Conclusions] The “digital intelligence + refinement” integrated management mode effectively solves the prominent issues in the management of architectural laboratories. It forms a 3D integrated system supported by digital technologies, guaranteed by refined systems, and adapted to discipline-specific scenarios, which considerably improves space utilization, reduces potential safety hazards, and optimizes resource allocation. The phased, iterative implementation path is especially suitable for architectural laboratories with complex functions and difficult reconstruction. In the future, the application of generative AI and digital twins can be further explored to achieve virtual–real integration, remote monitoring, and intelligent prediction, continuously improving the intelligence level and service capacity of architectural laboratory management.

参考文献

[1] 薛俊杰, 高金金. 数智赋能高校实验室建设与实验教学数字化改造的路径探索[J]. 办公自动化, 2024, 29(22): 50-53.

[2] 蒋吉明. 高校实验室建设管理之设计管理[J]. 城市建设理论研究(电子版), 2018(27): 74.

[3] 王广益. 探索BIM技术在高校实验室设备管理中的优势及应用方法[J]. 中国设备工程, 2024(2): 81-83.

[4] 寇琼洁, 刘雪锋. 智慧校园背景下实验室数字化管理探索与实践[J]. 中国现代教育装备, 2025(9): 31-33, 38.

[5] 刘哲, 张鑫, 李磊, 等. 以用房管理为核心的高校实验室信息化建设与实践[J]. 实验室研究与探索, 2025, 44(2): 214-219.

[6] 荆晶, 王宁, 李晓, 等. 基于提高岗位胜任力的实验技术队伍建设探索[J]. 实验室研究与探索, 2021, 40(8): 259-262.

[7] 梁勇, 任佳, 王春艳. 新时代高校实验技术队伍建设探索与实践[J]. 实验技术与管理, 2023, 40(6): 213-216, 227.

[8] 刘瑽, 周德环. 浅谈建筑科学类实验室的建设与管理[J]. 教育教学论坛, 2015(50): 9-10.

[9] 张昕玮, 崔彤. 实验室建筑历史沿革与空间演变研究[J]. 建筑技艺, 2022, 28(4): 106-109.

[10] 张蓉. 计算机实验室的管理与维护分析[J]. 电子技术, 2023, 52(3): 310-312.

[11]范淑媛, 吴霞, 金俊松. 适应多种实验教学管理模式的数字化平台研究与建设[J]. 高教学刊, 2024, 10(增刊1): 75-80.

[12] 林芳. 数智化、智能化建设在企业实验室的应用研究[J]. 中国金属通报, 2025(增刊1): 98-100.

[13]曾思明, 陈安, 谢小柱, 等. 电类实验数字化教学模式的研究与实践[J]. 实验科学与技术, 2025, 23(2): 48-53.

[14]李威. 高校科研平台的改造策略[J]. 工程抗震与加固改造, 2022, 44(4): 174.

[15] 金翊. 高校项目制实验技术队伍建设的探索与实践[J]. 实验技术与管理, 2021, 38(1): 251-254.

[16] 徐圆圆, 曹蓓, 曹旭. 高校内涵式发展背景下实验技术队伍建设路径思考[J]. 实验室研究与探索, 2020, 39(10): 258-260, 308.

基本信息:

中图分类号:G647;TU-0

引用信息:

[1]费莹.建筑类实验室“数智+精细”管理模式研究[J].实验技术与管理().

发布时间:

2026-08-05

出版时间:

2026-08-05

网络发布时间:

2026-08-05

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文