| 486 | 0 | 266 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
该文以雅安大石板隧道为依托工程,研究了浅埋隧道穿越边坡体系在地震作用下的动力响应特征。研究首先在三向六自由度振动台平台完成了模型箱布置、地质结构还原、衬砌制作及传感器布设等准备工作;然后构建了1∶50缩尺边坡-双隧道模型,采用汶川波作为地震输入,设定0.1 g、0.3 g、0.6 g三级加速度工况,模拟实际地震作用;最后分析了边坡破坏特征、高程放大效应及隧道衬砌的动态响应特征。实验结果表明:坡体破坏形式多样,具有明显空间分异性;坡顶加速度响应增强,存在高程放大效应;埋深较深段隧道衬砌损伤更重,主要集中于拱顶、仰拱和拱脚;结构应变随地震强度呈非线性增长,左右洞响应不同。实验结果为边坡-双隧道体系抗震设计提供了依据。
Abstract:[Objective] The dynamic behavior and seismic response of shallow-buried twin tunnels crossing slopes are critical issues in tunnel engineering, particularly in earthquake-prone regions. Given the frequent occurrence of earthquakes and landslides in Sichuan Province, research on seismic-induced dynamic interactions between slopes and tunnels is urgent and of practical significance. This study aims to investigate the dynamic response characteristics and damage mechanisms of slope-tunnel systems subjected to seismic loading, providing experimental data and theoretical insights crucial for the seismic design and construction safety of these types of infrastructures. The study focuses on the Dashi Ban tunnel in Ya'an, providing realistic insights into seismic mitigation measures and disaster prevention strategies. [Methods] To achieve a thorough understanding of the interactions between slopes and tunnels under seismic loads, a large-scale shaking table test was conducted at Southwest Jiaotong University's three-dimensional, six-degree-of-freedom shaking table facility. This involved meticulously preparing a scaled physical model(1:50) that accurately replicates the geological structure, slope configuration, and twin-tunnel geometry based on the Dashi Ban tunnel project. The slope-tunnel system model featured carefully designed lining structures, detailed sensor arrangements, and precise soil compaction to achieve an accurate simulation of the original engineering conditions. The input seismic wave was modeled using the historical Wenchuan earthquake record, reflecting realistic seismic excitation typical for the region. Three different seismic intensity levels(0.1 g, 0.3 g, and 0.6 g) were applied to analyze the dynamic responses and damage evolution systematically. Various sensors, including accelerometers, strain gauges, displacement transducers, and high-speed cameras, were strategically placed to monitor slope displacement, acceleration response, lining strains, and overall structural performance during seismic excitations. [Results] The experimental results provided detailed insights into slope failure modes, acceleration response amplification, and the unique structural responses of the twin tunnels under varying seismic intensities. The slope exhibited clear spatial heterogeneity in damage patterns, with the upper regions experiencing significantly higher accelerations and more severe deformations than the lower sections. A notable amplification effect was observed, indicating that seismic response intensity increased with slope height. Analysis of tunnel lining responses revealed distinct deformation characteristics heavily influenced by the tunnel's burial depth. Deeper segments exhibited greater vulnerability, showing substantial cracking and structural degradation primarily at the crown, invert, and sidewall footings. In addition, the structural strain within the tunnel linings demonstrated a pronounced non-linear relationship with increasing seismic intensity, highlighting critical transition thresholds at particular accelerations. The left and right tunnels displayed different response characteristics owing to their spatial relationships and interaction dynamics, underscoring the need for individualized assessments within twin-tunnel systems. [Conclusions] The shaking table test systematically elucidated the seismic-induced dynamic responses and failure characteristics of slope-tunnel systems, highlighting critical factors, including burial depth effects, seismic intensity, and spatial amplification effects. The observed non-linear deformation and significant structural degradation at greater tunnel depths highlight the need for targeted strengthening measures, particularly in vulnerable areas such as tunnel crowns, invert arches, and footings. The findings from this research provide crucial references for the seismic assessment and structural design of slope-tunnel systems in earthquake-prone regions, significantly enhancing our understanding of interaction mechanisms and dynamic response characteristics. Practical recommendations from this study include considering non-linear seismic responses and localized reinforcement strategies during the design and construction stages of shallow buried twin-tunnel systems traversing slopes. These insights should greatly contribute to improving the resilience and operational safety of tunnel infrastructure under seismic loading conditions.
[1]张国军,王希宝,肖锋,等.极高烈度地震区不同矢跨比曲线隧道地震响应分析[J].大连理工大学学报, 2025, 65(3):288–296.ZHANG G J, WANG X B, XIAO F, et al. Seismic response analysis of curved tunnels with different rise-span ratios in extremely high intensity seismic area[J]. Journal of Dalian University of Technology, 2025, 65(3):288–296.(in Chinese)
[2]张建,郭子润,李超杰,等.浅埋偏压黄土双连拱隧道-边坡地震响应特性研究[J].公路, 2024, 69(5):457–465.ZHANG J, GUO Z R, LI C J, et al. Research on seismic response characteristics of double-arch tunnel-slope in shallow-buried biased loess[J]. Highway, 2024, 69(5):457–465.(in Chinese)
[3]陈志荣,宋丹青,刘晓丽,等.隧道口顺层斜坡地震动力响应特征振动台试验[J].地球科学, 2022, 47(6):2069–2080.CHEN Z R, SONG D Q, LIU X L, et al. Seismic dynamic response characteristics of a layered slope at tunnel entrance using shaking table test[J]. Earth Science, 2022, 47(6):2069–2080.(in Chinese)
[4]冯海洲,蒋关鲁,何梓雷,等.框架梁与锚索桩板墙加固隧道洞口边坡的动力响应特性[J].中国铁道科学, 2024,45(2):134–145.FENG H Z, JIANG G L, HE Z L, et al. Dynamic response characteristics of tunnel portal slope reinforced by frame beam and anchor cable pile sheet wall[J]. China Railway Science,2024, 45(2):134–145.(in Chinese)
[5]雷浩,吴红刚,高岩,等.隧道交叉穿越边坡的动力响应振动台试验研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2022, 41(增刊2):3327–3338.LEI H, WU H G, GAO Y, et al. Shaking table test study on dynamic response of tunnel crossing through slope[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2022, 41(S2):3327–3338.(in Chinese)
[6]黄帅,刘静伟,李天昊.降雨-地震时序作用下边坡动力响应及变形失稳机理研究[J].振动与冲击, 2025, 44(4):265–274.HUANG S, LIU J W, LI T H. Research on dynamic response and deformation instability mechanism of slope under rainfall-earthquake sequences[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2025, 44(4):265–274.(in Chinese)
[7]陈星,黄强兵,刘妮娜,等.地震作用下邻近地裂缝带地铁隧道工程场地地表沉降研究[J].地质力学学报, 2018,24(5):714–722.CHEN X, HUANG Q B, LIU N N, et al. Study on ground settlement of engineering site of metro tunnel adjacent to ground fissure zone under the action of earthquake[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 2018, 24(5):714–722.(in Chinese)
[8]黄雨,张云秋,邱振东,等.强震作用下青藏高原地区断裂控制型边坡动力响应规律与变形破坏机制研究[J].中国科学:技术科学, 2025, 55(5):927–942.HUANG Y, ZHANG Y Q, QIU Z D, et al. Dynamic response and deformation failure mechanism of fault-controlled slope in Qinghai-Xizang Plateau under strong earthquake action[J].Scientia Sinica:Technologica, 2025, 55(5):927–942.(in Chinese)
[9]邹炎,景立平,李永强.隧道穿过土层分界面振动台模型试验研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2014, 33(增刊1):3340–3348.ZOU Y, JING L P, LI Y Q. Study of shaking table model test of tunnel through soil interface[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2014, 33(S1):3340–3348.(in Chinese)
[10]刘鸿哲,黄茂松.不同埋深矩形隧道地震响应的离心振动台试验[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2013, 32(增刊2):3404–3412.LIU H Z, HUANG M S. Centrifuge model tests of seismic response of rectangular tunnels at different buried depths[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2013,32(S2):3404–3412.(in Chinese)
[11]代勇,李冰天,邓旨珩,等.基于强度折减法裂损衬砌隧道地震稳定性分析[J].地下空间与工程学报, 2021, 17(增刊2):940–948.DAI Y, LI B T, DENG Z H et al. Seismic stability analysis of cracked lining tunnel based on strength reduction method[J].Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2021,17(S2):940–948.(in Chinese)
[12]张存,郑文,罗凯凯,等.分层土-隧道相互作用体系地震响应分析[J].地震工程学报, 2024, 46(3):602–613.ZHANG C, ZHENG W, LUO K K, et al. Seismic response of layered soil-tunnel interaction system[J]. China Earthquake Engineering Journal, 2024, 46(3):602–613.(in Chinese)
[13]李仁强,马至刚,衣忠强,等.地震高烈度区软岩隧道结构动力响应特性研究[J].铁道工程学报, 2022, 39(9):56–63, 92.LI R Q, MA Z G, YI Z Q, et al. Research on the dynamic response characteristics of soft rock tunnel structure in high seismic intensity area[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2022, 39(9):56–63, 92.(in Chinese)
[14]孙文,梁庆国,刘青霞,等.强震作用下黄土隧道洞口段地震动放大效应研究[J].地震工程学报, 2021, 43(4):935–943.SUN W, LIANG Q G, LIU Q X, et al. Amplification effect of the portal section of loess tunnels under strong earthquake[J].China Earthquake Engineering Journal, 2021, 43(4):935–943.(in Chinese)
[15]高会会,裴向军,崔圣华,等.大型振动台试验饱水白云岩相似材料配比研究[J].地质灾害与环境保护, 2024, 35(2):71–76.GAO H H, PEI X J, CUI S H, et al. Study on the similar materials ratio of saturated dolomite in large shaking table test[J]. Journal of Geological Hazards and Environment Preservation, 2024, 35(2):71–76.(in Chinese)
[16]曹晖,赖明,白绍良.适合于地震工程信号分析的快速小波变换法研究[J].工程力学, 2002(4):141–148.CAO H, LAI M, BAI S L. Fast algorithm for wavelet transform adaptive to the analysis of signals in earthquake engineering[J].Engineering Mechanics, 2002(4):141–148.(in Chinese)
[17]晏启祥,张煜,王春艳,等.剪切波作用下盾构隧道地震效应的拟静力分析方法研究[J].工程力学, 2015, 32(5):184–191.YAN Q X, ZHANG Y, WANG C Y, et al. Quasi-static analysis method for seismic effect of shear waves on shield tunnel[J].Engineering Mechanics, 2015, 32(5):184–191.(in Chinese)
基本信息:
DOI:10.16791/j.cnki.sjg.2025.12.001
中图分类号:U452.28
引用信息:
[1]郑余朝,潘元贵,章慧健,等.边坡-双隧道体系的振动台实验设计与地震响应研究[J].实验技术与管理,2025,42(12):1-9.DOI:10.16791/j.cnki.sjg.2025.12.001.
基金信息:
国家自然科学基金面上项目(52078431)