| 63 | 0 | 64 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
以拉萨-林芝铁路杰德秀二号隧道为依托工程，在考虑初期支护条件下构建了“二衬-减震层-初期支护-围岩”体系，通过振动台模型试验研究了衬砌的动力响应特征与损伤演化过程。结果表明：增加减震结构虽不可改变衬砌的频谱形态，但能极大地削减频谱曲线峰值；随输入地震强度增加，反应谱由多峰转为单峰，卓越周期延长；常规段与减震段衬砌的动应变峰值曲线存在显著差异，且减震段的应变峰值增长速率明显小于常规段。基于塑性变形系数PDI(plastic deformation index)将损伤过程划分为弹性、弹塑性、塑性三阶段，减震层可减少塑性变形并提高衬砌韧性。考虑初期支护的减震措施极大地削弱了隧道的塑性变形程度，进而有效提高隧道的抗减震能力。研究成果可为地震高发区隧道衬砌的韧性消能技术提供参考。
Abstract：[Objective] Tunnels in high-intensity seismic regions are susceptible to severe damage from earthquakes, such as lining cracking, spalling, invert uplift, and progressive plastic deformation, which jeopardize structural safety and serviceability. Although seismic isolation layers have been widely applied to mitigate tunnel seismic responses, most studies have primarily focused on the interaction between the secondary lining and isolation layer, often overlooking the role of primary support, an essential component in tunnel construction. This study aims to elucidate the dynamic response characteristics and damage evolution of tunnel linings when seismic mitigation measures are implemented under realistic primary support conditions. By integrating primary support into the mitigation system, the study experimentally evaluates the effectiveness of a composite configuration comprising the secondary lining, seismic isolation layer, primary support, and surrounding rock, providing guidance for resilience-oriented tunnel seismic design. [Methods] The Jiedexiu No. 2 Tunnel on the Lhasa-Nyingchi Railway was selected as a representative case for a series of shaking-table model tests. A gravity-distorted similarity model was developed based on the Buckingham π theorem, featuring a geometric similarity ratio of 1:40, alongside appropriate scaling of elastic modulus, density, displacement, and acceleration. The surrounding rock and overburden were simulated using Grade V phyllite and gravelly-breccia soils, respectively. The secondary lining was modeled with gypsum to simulate C30 concrete, whereas sponge rubber material was used as the seismic isolation layer. Basalt fiber-reinforced polymer anchors were employed to simulate rock bolts in the primary support. Horizontal excitation was applied using the El Centro earthquake wave with peak ground accelerations of 0.1 g, 0.2 g, 0.3 g, and 0.4 g. Acceleration sensors and strain gauges were arranged symmetrically to compare a conventional section with a mitigated section that incorporated the isolation layer and primary support. Dynamic responses were analyzed in the time and frequency domains, which included acceleration time histories, Fourier spectra, and acceleration response spectra. To quantify cumulative damage, a plastic deformation index(PDI), defined as the ratio of residual strain to peak dynamic strain, was introduced to classify damage evolution into elastic, elasto-plastic, and plastic stages. [Results] Results show that the seismic isolation layer significantly reduces the peak amplitudes of acceleration response spectra and Fourier spectra without altering their overall shapes. Under low-intensity excitation(0.1 g), the response spectra exhibit multipeak characteristics with a predominant period of approximately 0.06 s. As ground-motion intensity increases, the spectra transition to a single-peak pattern, accompanied by a lengthening of the predominant period to approximately 0.08 s, indicating enhanced system nonlinearity and amplification of low-frequency components. Dynamic strain measurements reveal that the mitigated section consistently experiences lower strain peaks and slower strain accumulation, particularly at the crown and invert, whereas the haunch exhibits the weakest mitigation effect due to strong boundary constraints. PDI analysis indicates that the conventional section enters a plastic-dominated state when excitation exceeds 0.3 g, whereas the mitigated section remains primarily in the elasto-plastic stage with substantially lower PDI values. Post-test observations confirm that damage in the mitigated section is markedly reduced compared to the conventional section. [Conclusions] Experimental results demonstrate that a seismic mitigation configuration that explicitly considers primary support and incorporates a seismic isolation layer can effectively improve tunnel seismic performance under high-intensity earthquake loading. This composite system reduces spectral amplitudes and plastic deformation demand while preserving the fundamental spectral characteristics of the lining response. The mitigation effect is most pronounced at the invert and crown, indicating that the haunch remains a critical area requiring additional design attention. The proposed approach provides a practical experimental basis for energy-dissipation-oriented seismic design and retrofitting of tunnels in earthquake-prone regions.
[1]《中国公路学报》编辑部.中国隧道工程学术研究综述·2015[J].中国公路学报, 2015, 28(5):1–65.Editorial Department of China Journal of Highway and Transport.Review on China’s tunnel engineering research:2015[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2015, 28(5):1–65.(in Chinese)
[2]Chen P L, Geng P, He D W, et al. A novel tool for seismic response analysis of tunnel in multilayered media based on kinematic earthquake source[J]. Engineering Geology, 2024,340:107675.
[3]Wang T T, Kwok O L A, Jeng F S. Seismic response of tunnels revealed in two decades following the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake(Mw 7.6)in Taiwan:A review[J]. Engineering Geology, 2021,287:106090.
[4]Chen P L, Geng P, Chen J B, et al. The seismic damage mechanism of Daliang tunnel by fault dislocation during the2022 Menyuan Ms6.9 earthquake based on unidirectional velocity pulse input[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2023,145:107047.
[5]Shrestha R, Li X P, Yi L, et al. Seismic damage and possible influencing factors of the damages in the melamchi tunnel in Nepal due to Gorkha earthquake 2015[J]. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2020, 38(5):5295–5308.
[6]Yu H T, Chen J T, Yuan Y, et al. Seismic damage of mountain tunnels during the 5.12 Wenchuan earthquake[J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2016, 13(11):1958–1972.
[7]Li T B. Damage to mountain tunnels related to the Wenchuan earthquake and some suggestions for aseismic tunnel construction[J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment,2012, 71(2):297–308.
[8]Tian Q Y, Zhang J T, Zhang Y L. Similar simulation experiment of expressway tunnel in karst area[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 176:1–13.
[9]Zhou T L, Dong C S, Fu Z P, et al. Study on seismic response and damping performance of tunnels with double shock absorption layer[J]. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2022,26(5):2490–2508.
[10]Luo H S, Zheng C F, Du L Z, et al. Longitudinal shock absorption performance of energy dissipationprestressing joint between shield tunnel rings[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2025, 195:109418.
[11]Lai J X, He S Y, Qiu J L, et al. Characteristics of seismic disasters and aseismic measures of tunnels in Wenchuan earthquake[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2017, 76(2):94.
[12]Callisto L, Ricci C. Interpretation and back-analysis of the damage observed in a deep tunnel after the 2016 Norcia earthquake in Italy[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2019, 89:238–248.
[13]Bobet A, Yu H T, Tiwari N. Seismic response of shallow circular openings to Rayleigh waves[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2023, 135:105036.
[14]Xu C B, Hu H C, Wang H. A theoretical study on the resilience evaluation method of operational road tunnel systems[J].Applied Sciences, 2023, 13(24):13279.
[15]Sun F X, Shi L F, Wang J N, et al. Seismic response analysis of close-distance cross tunnels:Shaking table test and numerical parameter analysis[J]. Structures, 2023, 50:1670–1685.
[16]Shen Y S, Wang Z Z, Yu J, et al. Shaking table test on flexible joints of mountain tunnels passing through normal fault[J].Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2020, 98:103299.
[17]Huang J Q, Du X L, Zhao M, et al. Impact of incident angles of earthquake shear(S)waves on 3-D non-linear seismic responses of long lined tunnels[J]. Engineering Geology, 2017, 222:168–185.
[18]Cabangon L T, Elia G, Rouainia M. Modelling the transverse behaviour of circular tunnels in structured clayey soils during earthquakes[J]. Acta Geotechnica, 2019, 14(1):163–178.
[19]Xu H, Li T B, Xia L, et al. Shaking table tests on seismic measures of a model mountain tunnel[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 60:197–209.
[20]Tang B L, Ren Y Q. Study on seismic response and damping measures of surrounding rock and secondary lining of deep tunnel[J]. Shock and Vibration, 2021, 2021(1):7824527.
[21]Xin C L, Wang Z Z, Zhou J M, et al. Shaking table tests on seismic behavior of polypropylene fiber reinforced concrete tunnel lining[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology,2019, 88:1–15.
[22]Cao X P, Zhang Y P, Zhang Y R. Anti-seismic effect of the shock absorption layer in tunnel[J]. International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering, 2020, 10(1):41–47.
[23]王明年,崔光耀.高烈度地震区隧道减震模型的建立及其减震效果模型试验研究[J].岩土力学, 2010, 31(6):1884–1890.Wang M N, Cui G Y. Establishment of tunnel damping model and research on damping effect with model test in highly seismic area[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2010, 31(6):1884–1890.(in Chinese)
[24]Liu Z X, Ai T C, Huang L, et al. Seismic dynamic response analysis of mountain tunnels with seismic reduction and isolation measures[J]. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2023, 27(1):109–121.
[25]Luo Y B, Chen J X, Shi Z, et al. Mechanical characteristics of primary support of large span loess highway tunnel:A case study in Shaanxi Province, Loess Plateau, NW China primary[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2020, 104:103532.
[26]Wei H, Tao Z G, He M C, et al. The cumulative damage evolution law of Multi-Anchor Circular Piles reinforced landslide under earthquake action[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering,2024, 57(8):6321–6336.
[27]Shaw B E. Earthquake surface slip-length data is fit by constant stress drop and is useful for seismic hazard analysis[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2013, 103(2A):876–893.
[28]Pai L F, Wu H G. Multi-attribute seismic data spectrum analysis of tunnel orthogonal underpass landslide shaking table test[J].Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2021, 150:106889.
[29]Wei H, Wu H G, Ren G J, et al. Energy-based analysis of seismic damage mechanism of multi-anchor piles in tunnel crossing landslide area[J]. Deep Underground Science and Engineering, 2023, 2(3):245–261.
[30]Zhang J H, Yuan Y, Bao Z, et al. Shaking table tests on the intersection of cross passage and twin tunnels[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2019, 124:136–150.
[31]Buckingham E. On physically similar systems; illustrations of the use of dimensional equations[J]. Physical Review, 1914,4(4):345–376.
[32]Guan Z C, Zhou Y, Gou X D, et al. The seismic responses and seismic properties of large section mountain tunnel based on shaking table tests[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2019, 90:383–393.
[33]李冰天,仇文革,戚幸鑫,等.衬砌纵向开裂隧道地震响应振动台的试验研究[J].西南交通大学学报, 2021, 56(1):20–27, 55.Li B T, Qiu W G, Qi X X, et al. Shaking table tests on seismic response of tunnel with longitudinal cracking lining[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2021, 56(1):20–27, 55.(in Chinese)
[34]王帅帅,高波,隋传毅,等.减震层减震原理及跨断层隧道减震技术振动台试验研究[J].岩土工程学报, 2015, 37(6):1086–1092.Wang S S, Gao B, Sui C Y, et al. Mechanism of shock absorption layer and shaking table tests on shaking absorption technology of tunnel across fault[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2015, 37(6):1086–1092.(in Chinese)
[35]Chen J, Jiang L Z, Li J, et al. Numerical simulation of shaking table test on utility tunnel under non-uniform earthquake excitation[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology,2012, 30:205–216.
[36]Xu X, Huang Y. Parametric study of structural parameters affecting seismic stability in slopes reinforced by pile-anchor structures[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2021,147:106789.
[37]Hong C S, Yang H J, Kang Y S, et al. A study of the correlation between sinusoidal sweep and random vibration durability tests through specimen tests[J]. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 2016, 17(12):1665–1671.
[38]Cesea S, Grigoli F. Full waveform seismological advances for microseismic monitoring[J]. Advances in Geophysics, 2015, 56:169–228.
[39]吴红刚,牌立芳,庞伟军,等.超小净间距小角度立体交叉上跨隧道加速度响应振动台试验研究[J].振动与冲击, 2021,40(18):298–306.Wu H G, Pai L F, Pang W J, et al. Vibration table tests on the acceleration response of a three-dimensional cross tunnel with small net spacing and small angle[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2021, 40(18):298–306.(in Chinese)
[40]Song D Q, Liu X L, Huang J, et al. Seismic cumulative failure effects on a reservoir bank slope with a complex geological structure considering plastic deformation characteristics using shaking table tests[J]. Engineering Geology, 2021, 286:106085.
[41]韦洪,吴红刚,吴道勇,等.双排桩加固滑坡地段隧道衬砌地震累积变形效应试验研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2023,42(增刊2):3966–3979.Wei H, Wu H G, Wu D Y, et al. Experimental study on the seismic cumulative deformation effect of tunnel lining in landslide area reinforced by double-row piles[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2023, 42(S2):3966–3979.(in Chinese)
基本信息:
DOI：10.16791/j.cnki.sjg.2026.07.005
中图分类号:U459.1
引用信息:
[1]齐兵,徐海斌,蒋晨晨,等.考虑初支作用的隧道减震措施动力性能试验研究[J].实验技术与管理,2026,43(07):42-51.DOI:10.16791/j.cnki.sjg.2026.07.005.
基金信息:
国家自然科学基金面上项目(42377195); 中央高校基本科研业务费(中国矿业大学(北京)博士研究生拔尖创新人才培育基金)(BBJ2026087)
2026-03-14
2026-03-14
2026-03-14